On Point Expertise

Legal Analysis & Writing

  • For lawyers
  • For Others
  • Bio
  • Samples
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Blawg
  • Deliberate Solos
  • Federal & State
  • Immigration

Lawyers: you should use more humor.

May 15, 2018 by Zara Watkins in legal writing, argument

We lawyers can be a dour bunch. But we don’t have to be. I try to use humor in my oral and written arguments as much as possible. Keep reading to find out why you should too.

Read More
May 15, 2018 /Zara Watkins
legal writing, humor, lawyers, boring, interesting, oral argument
legal writing, argument
Comment

Be a stickler for the (state and federal) rules.

April 24, 2017 by Zara Watkins in legal research, legal writing, argument

We lawyers work within the rule of law; so we necessarily work with a ton of rules. Love it or hate it, your success as a litigator depends on knowing which procedural rules apply to your case (and making sure you follow them precisely). In this post, I share my two part method for navigating the sea of rules in state, federal, and immigration courts that ensures neither my papers nor my arguments are rejected because I missed an applicable rule.

Read More
April 24, 2017 /Zara Watkins
rules, laws, rule of law, procedure, litigation, lawyer, motions, filings, outsource, out-source, legal writing, appeals
legal research, legal writing, argument
Comment

Be a more effective lawyer by organizing these 3 areas.

March 30, 2016 by Zara Watkins in argument

To be an effective lawyer, we must present our arguments logically–but that is impossible to do without meticulous organization. Read on for 3 areas where being organized is crucial to success.

Read More
March 30, 2016 /Zara Watkins
organization, argument, persuasion, space, systems, thoughts
argument
Comment

Changing the US Postal Service presumption

January 21, 2016 by Zara Watkins in argument

Why should the court insist your mail was delivered when the post office keeps losing it?

Read More
January 21, 2016 /Zara Watkins
post office, mail delivery, presumption, receipt, caselaw
argument
Comment

Disclaimer: the content on this site is intended as general information for attorneys, law firms, and non-lawyers seeking appellate representation; nothing stated on this site or on the blawg should be taken or used as legal, accounting, or other professional advice; rather, it is information on how lawyers can use services from Zara Watkins, Esq. on a freelance, outsource, or outsourcing basis and how non-lawyers can engage Zara Watkins, Esq. to represent them on appeal.  None of the content contained on this site constitutes grounds to establish an attorney-client relationship, and you should not consider it as such. Updates in the law may or may not be discussed; please do not rely on any information contained on this site or the blawg as currently applicable. There is no guarantee that you will win your appeal.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING: PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE SIMILAR OUTCOMES.

Copyright, all rights reserved. Zara Watkins, Esq., PO Box 627, NY, NY 10274 (mailing address; home office address available upon request).